Tag: classification

THE ASSESSMENT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC POTENTIAL DENSITY OF ARCTIC TERRITORIES IN RUSSIA

Vyacheslav L. BABURIN

Professor, Department of economic and social geography of Russia, Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

baburin@yandex.ru

Vladimir S. TIKUNOV

Professor, Integrated Mapping Laboratory, Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

vstikunov@yandex.ru

Svetlana V. BADINA

Department of economic and social geography of Russia, Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

bad412@yandex.ru

Olga Yu. CHERESHNIA

Researcher, Integrated Mapping Laboratory, Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

chereshnya.o@yandex.ru

Abstract

The socio-economic potential is an important indicator that systematically characterizes a specific territory with its economic specifics, as well as the opportunities for its future development.  The article presents a methodology for assessing the density of social and economic potential. The integral index of the socio-economic potential density of the territory takes into account the basic spatial characteristics (indicators): The density of the population concentrated on a given territory, the volume of fixed assets, as well as the level of economic development, defined as the accumulated volume of gross production per area of the economically developed space.  On the basis of this method the estimation of the density of social and economic potential of Russian Arctic territories was carried out, a rating was obtained and a classification was made. Allocated 5 density types of socio-economic potential: metropolitan and industrial; urban and industrial; mixed, mainly West-Central; mixed, mainly Western; peripheral.

Keywords: socio-economic potential, arctic territories, index, classification

JEL classification:
read more

TYPOLOGY OF EMERGING PATTERNS OF THE MEDITERRANEAN AREA IN THE ENERGY SECTOR: A TWO TIER APPROACH

Anastasia BISKA

PhD Candidate, National Technical University of Athens, School of Rural and Surveying Engineering, Department of Geography and Regional Planning, Iroon Polytechniou 9, Campus Zografou,   15780 Athens, Greece, Tel.: +30 210 7722756, E-mail: abiska@survey.ntua.gr

and

Maria GIAOUTZI

Professor, National Technical University of Athens, School of Rural and Surveying Engineering, Department of Geography and Regional Planning, Iroon Polytechniou 9, Campus Zografou,15780 Athens, Greece, Tel.: +30 210 7722749, E-mail: giaoutsi@central.ntua.gr

Abstract

Energy poverty is intensely debated lately, mainly at the political level, both in the developed and developing world. The concept of energy poverty refers to issues such as lack of the necessary infrastructure that prevents citizens from having access to various sources of energy.

In the Mediterranean region, there is a divergence among countries, regarding both the energy poverty patterns and the related policy framework. Apparent differences also appear between the EU countries and non-EU countries, concerning the existing infrastructure, the energy demand, the availability of natural resources and energy sources and the related policy measures.

The aim of this paper is to develop a typology of the energy poverty patterns in the Mediterranean countries and elaborate on the prospects for policy measures.

The first part provides the definition of energy poverty and the patterns appearing in the Mediterranean region. The second part presents data issues on the energy consumption and production patterns in the study region. In the third part, the available data and their sources are presented, while the fourth part presents the methodological framework and the tools used in a clustering exercise in order to identify groups of countries with similar characteristics which may be addressed by a common set of policies. The clustering process consists of two separate parts, one including all the Mediterranean countries and a second clustering separately the EU and the non-EU countries in order to identify differences among the two clusters. The fifth part presents the results of the clustering process and the visualization of the new typologies. Finally, in the sixth part, follows a set of conclusions drawn from the resulting typologies, but also the prospects for policy action in the Mediterranean region.

read more