SPATIAL DISPARITIES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: A MACROSCOPIC REVIEW

Serafeim POLYZOS

Professor, Department of Planning and Regional Development, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece

spolyzos@uth.gr

Dimitrios TSIOTAS

Assistant Professor, Department of Regional and Economic Development, School of Applied Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Athens, Amfissa (Phocis), Greece

tsiotas@aua.gr

(Corresponding Author)

Abstract

The European Union (EU) is a unique and challenging project aimed at integrating countries with diverse languages, cultures, and histories. While economic cohesion is a key objective, reducing inequalities between Member States and ensuring balanced development for all citizens remains a significant challenge. Despite the progress made, Europe continues to face considerable geographical and economic disparities, impacting living standards, productive capacity, and technological advancement. Analyzing these inequalities, their determinants, and their mitigating policies is crucial for understanding the EU’s challenges. The allocation of EU financial resources and strategic initiatives, such as the Structural Funds, strive to reduce disparities and promote social cohesion, while also tackling emerging issues such as migration and reliance on public expenditure. This article reviews the root causes of inequalities in Europe, the policies designed to mitigate them, and the future obstacles in achieving a more united and socially just European Union.

Keywords: spatial inequalities, European Union’s enlargements, economic indicators, European growth, cohesion.

JEL classification: O18, R11, I38, D63, F15

pp. 13-36

read more

PLACE-BASED POLICY RESPONSES TO SPATIAL INEQUALITIES

Daniela- Luminița CONSTANTIN

Professor at the Department of Administration and Public Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies; Bucharest, Romania

danielaconstantin_2005@yahoo.com

Clara-Alexandra VOLINTIRU

Professor at the Department of International Business and Economics, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies; Bucharest, Romania

clara.volintiru@gmail.com

Abstract

This paper aims to contribute a review of the recent literature on spatial inequalities at subnational level, building on the main foundations of regional studies and specific preoccupations with this subject. The overview of the literature has sought to derive key trends and to identify current knowledge frontiers and debates. It has been deployed on a comprehensive and systematic research of the relevant sources of the past decades and has been structured into three main parts, namely: (1) basic contributions and recent and state-of-the-art literature, (2) current debates, open issues or questions and (3) policy implications. The undertaken inquiries point to a variety of approaches, from those which bring into the spotlight the ‘left-behind places’, the ‘places that don’t matter’ (and their revenge), the ‘geography of discontent’, etc. to those proposing an entire typology for the lagging regions, revealing the interest of both academic community and policy-makers in this subject. The policies gravitate around place-based solutions, which, without neglecting the strongest European regions, aim to support the weaker regions as well. They go beyond simple compensatory measures, concentrating on the turning to good account of the untapped potential of the left-behind places. Moreover, building on the up-to-date findings and useful lessons, the current orientations regarding the future of the Cohesion Policy and the European growth model point to the need of a deeper integration of place-based and people-based approaches, in accordance with the spatial justice desideratum, as well as to the ambition “to bring EU closer to citizens and to leave no one behind” (European Commission, 2023, p.5), in the complex context generated by the ongoing transitions – energy, digital, industrial ones – and COVID-19 recovery.

Keywords: spatial inequalities, European Union, spatial justice, place-based solutions, people-based approaches

JEL classification: R10, R11, R28, R58,

 pp. 43-62

read more